A Mom takes her cute daughter in and sells her images as stock photos.

The Mom is then OUTRAGED when her daughter’s image is used in support of a political cause she doesn’t support.

Well… Mom… maybe you should have read the contract??

She wants an “apology”. Never mind the ad agency that used the images she sold in GOOD FAITH. Never mind the organization that bought the ad that used the image she sold in GOOD FAITH.  It seems, based on the information in the linked article that apologies and money should flow from the Mom to the agency and cause.

So, today, as two examples, we have a sushi customer INVENTING a contract, and  a Mom breaking one.

I’m just not sure where this country is heading. No place good.

BTW: The cause is question is an EXCELLENT ONE.