Aug 20

image thumb15 Some amendments more equal than others

Roger Ebert, film critic, says this (about the Ground Zero Mosque):

The First Amendment comes down to this: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."

I’m just picking on Roger because he is the latest I’ve caught saying it. Nor am I going to demand military experience, or even for that matter, know what the hell they are talking about.

What I do wish for, however, is similar concern for all the amendments and rights.

For instance, the 2nd amendment. I’d be happy to have Roger sacrifice for my right to defend myself, but I doubt he is interested.

And I didn’t hear any liberals going on about “defending to the death” property rights in the Kelo eminent domain case. (4th amendment)

Nor are they beating down the doors complaining about how powerful the Federal government is, and how it has usurped, effectively the 10th Amendment.

And those cops that were declared innocent in state court, and then brought up on charges in Federal court. No liberals were screaming about dying for the 5th amendment then.

Here is a tip….  if it is bad for the country, then to a liberal, the Constitution protects it. If it is good for the country, well… we may let you do it, but we will tax it.

3 Responses to “Some amendments more equal than others”

  1. Carl Nelson Says:

    Remember that the bad, bad federal government was made by your representatives acting on behalf of their citizens. Since they made it, they can also change it. We still have self-governance in America. Your basic complaint is that too many of your fellow citizens disagree with your concepts.

  2. Anonymous Says:

    The problem isn’t that the federal govt. is BAD, it’s that it’s BIG. Ken hasn’t said the feds are bad, they’re to powerful and they play exclusively with other peoples cash.

    And what do they spend it on? WELFARE! Have a look at this NYtimes graphic:
    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/02/01/us/budget.html

    most of the ”income security” minus military retirement is WELFARE. and those who receive it vote for whoever gives them more.

  3. Ken Says:

    You assume a non-corrupt system. I don’t think we have that. Not with more than half paying nothing. It may be “legal” but it is corrupt to have so few contributing and so many taking.