Comments on: New Carry Gun: Glock 22 http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722 Politics, Technology, and other stuff from St. George, UT Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:11:36 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Kevin http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722/comment-page-1#comment-5248 Kevin Wed, 17 Feb 2010 23:04:58 +0000 http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722#comment-5248 I just completed the quarterly qualification for my department. No malfunctions, no problems of any kind with Kimber Custom TLE, Glocks 19 and 26, and LCP. I may need a new on-duty holster for Kimber, as my quickest time for seated draw and fire was 2.1 seconds. Not fast enough. I might go Blackhawk Serpa or Safariland ALS. None of the duty weapon options we have, including HK and Sigs, shoots as accurately at a distance as a good 1911. I just completed the quarterly qualification for my department. No malfunctions, no problems of any kind with Kimber Custom TLE, Glocks 19 and 26, and LCP. I may need a new on-duty holster for Kimber, as my quickest time for seated draw and fire was 2.1 seconds. Not fast enough. I might go Blackhawk Serpa or Safariland ALS.
None of the duty weapon options we have, including HK and Sigs, shoots as accurately at a distance as a good 1911.

]]> By: D E http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722/comment-page-1#comment-5238 D E Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:49:58 +0000 http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722#comment-5238 I also express interest in the 1911! The Sig 226 as much as I love it is not suitable for a carry gun. Its just too bulky. That is why I have a Kahr .40 and a Kel Tec .380. Also why I am looking at the Sig 239. I also express interest in the 1911!

The Sig 226 as much as I love it is not suitable for a carry gun. Its just too bulky. That is why I have a Kahr .40 and a Kel Tec .380. Also why I am looking at the Sig 239.

]]> By: Kevin http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722/comment-page-1#comment-5234 Kevin Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:07:02 +0000 http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722#comment-5234 Email me a price on your 1911 if you are really going to sell it Email me a price on your 1911 if you are really going to sell it

]]> By: Ken http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722/comment-page-1#comment-5230 Ken Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:36:46 +0000 http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722#comment-5230 The 27 just seemed small in my hands but big when I put it on my hip. The Ruger handles that area. The 22 fits fine under an untucked shirt. It is lighter than the 1911 was. The SR9 (Ruger) is appealing, but it actually felt bigger than the Glock. The 27 just seemed small in my hands but big when I put it on my hip. The Ruger handles that area. The 22 fits fine under an untucked shirt. It is lighter than the 1911 was. The SR9 (Ruger) is appealing, but it actually felt bigger than the Glock.

]]> By: Kevin http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722/comment-page-1#comment-5212 Kevin Wed, 17 Feb 2010 05:11:33 +0000 http://www.kennelson.com/newblog/new-carry-gun-glock-22-8722#comment-5212 Big gun for off duty. Why not a 27? Well, if you like it, I guess.I like my 26 with a 15 round mag. Kind of like that ruger 9mm but I already have a 19.I might get the SA xd .45 also Big gun for off duty. Why not a 27? Well, if you like it, I guess.I like my 26 with a 15 round mag. Kind of like that ruger 9mm but I already have a 19.I might get the SA xd .45 also

]]>