You won’t find anything positive about either of them on this blog. My ratio is proudly 100% negative. I’ve even used barnyard by-products to describe them. But the press have bigger obligations and they aren’t meeting them.
Anchoress points out that the problem with coverage of Obama isn’t negative vs positive ratios, but that the press:
won’t report on Obama anything that does not suit their narrative?
The problem is one of omission. You don’t need to spin it negative or positive. Just report the facts, and in many cases the facts are damning.
For instance, does the typical American know that Obama made kissy with a genocidal Kenyan politician? or that Obama’s website accepts illegal donations? That is one of a dozen or more crazy facts that would shock most Americans about Obama you will not see in the mainstream press.
That is why I say HURT THEM.
I have to show unflattering Obama pics