Mar 12

Slate has an interesting 6 part article on “signs”.

http://www.slate.com/id/2245644/

The photo tour of bad signs through Penn Station really hits home:

image thumb55 Signs Signs Everywhere

My son and I flew to Atlanta last November. At Hartsfield-Jackson Airport, we joined a long line of travelers going up an escalator into what turned out to be a smoky beer joint. The signs for baggage claim seemed to point there.    I’m not sure how many people at that point gave up and whether from embarrassment or frustration stopped for a beer.

Mar 09

image thumb34 Department of Odd Sports

The USA Memory Championship was held yesterday, further proof that people will compete at virtually any human endeavor. The winner validated his surprise win from last year:

"I am beyond happy because I had to prove that (last year’s victory) was not chance, so now I am totally at peace. I love to compete against myself and getting better and better," said Ronnie White, of Fort Worth, Texas.

Which begs the  question as to why he couldn’t memorize a longer victory speech (-:

I participate in niche sports too, so I’m not mocking. Not at all. I think its great that we like to compete. I hope our economic competition survives the latest onslaught.

The competition sounds tough… memorize 99 names, 100+ digits in the right order. I’d get a headache. But I’m glad somebody can do and enjoy it.

Mar 05

image thumb26 How libertarian am I?

According to the Nolan Chart Quiz I just took at GlennBeck.com

Take it here is you like: http://www.nolanchart.com/survey.php

My desire to project American force abroad against terrorists kept me off the peak of libertarianism.

Mar 01

Hiroshima 64 years after an A-bomb destroyed much of it:

image thumb6 Tale of 2 cities

Detroit 64 years after the A-bomb hit Hiroshima:

image thumb7 Tale of 2 cities 

Proving, unfortunately, that over the long term, Democrats are worse than atomic bombs.

H/T  RM

Feb 26

image thumb87 The fewer voters the better 
Future voter

The cool Constitution we love and that has served us so well til 1913 was created and ratified at the point in our Country’s history when we had the fewest percentage of voters. Only propertied, free men, above a certain age, could vote back then.

Have things gotten better the more of us that voted?  Clearly not. In fact, each dramatic increase in voting has brought with it more bad governance. This isn’t because poor people, woman or blacks are stupid and shouldn’t vote, but because by increasing the number of voters we turned our Democracy into a “tragedy of the commons” problem – by your vote not really counting, you don’t care about it as much.

Jamie Whyte has been thinking about this and believes the less voters, the more their vote counts, and the more they consider their vote, thus increasing quality of policies enacted:

The reason so many bad policies are good politics is that so many people vote: about 62 percent of adults at the last general election, both in Great Britain and in the United States. The best way to get more sensible policies would be to reduce the number of voters to less than 0.01 percent of the population.

But how would this happen?  He proposes random selection of voters, hiding that they are voters until the last minute, and then taking them away to vote in the full public eye.

To safeguard against the possibility of abuse, these 6,420 voters would not know that they had been selected at random until the moment when the polling officers arrived at their house. They would then be spirited away to a place where they will spend a week locked away with the candidates, attending a series of speeches, debates and question-and-answer sessions before voting on the final day. All of these events should be filmed and broadcast, so that everyone could make sure that nothing dodgy was going on.

I like this type of approach.  Come on admit it… you think most voters are idiots.  We’ve all talked to people in line at the polling place, or who had a “I voted” sticker, that were complete morons.  You walk away muttering “That idiot canceled my vote!”.

A system like Whyte’s would have issues. It wouldn’t disenfranchise as long as the selection is truly random (we all have an equal shot).   But he doesn’t explain how laws are introduced and vetted prior to voting.  That is why I like my idea of keeping the current Congress but adding a 3rd “Random” house that can veto.

I’m fine with Whyte’s system of picking the Random house.   I’d also be fine if small random group voted in the members of the House and Senate.

We need to do something.  The more we’ve increased Democracy the worse it has become.

Feb 26

image thumb86 For that Math major you know…

Most of them I can sort out, but not the 4 circles with one blacked out. Probably obvious, but I’m missing it…

Feb 11

image thumb40 Crazy goats

Personally, I don’t think that that tuft of grass is worth the risk dude!

http://www.bannedinhollywood.com/30-pictures-of-goats-being-crazy/

Feb 09

Cool name, and a cool picture:

image thumb28 Snowpocalypse

That is snow, ladies and gentlemen, lots of it!

Feb 08

My son arranged for a tour of our local bullet making company.  His write up of the tour can be found here:

http://briankevinnelson.com/a-tour-to-berrys-mfg-80

201002081057 How bullets are made

Yesterday Dad and I went on a tour of the Berry’s Manufacturing factory. Berry’s, a business local to us in St. George, Utah, makes some of the finest bullets for competition and hunting. But Berry’s offers much more than just bullets, as Dad and I found out…

I suggested one minor edit, but other than that one sentence change, it is all him. As usual, feedback welcome.

Feb 05

Over 2500 left-handed people a year are killed from using equipment made for right-handed people.

The right-handed power saw is the most deadly item.

Via http://omg-facts.com/

Help available here

Related: Odd ways to die

Feb 03

image thumb11 Bullies, Rejection, and Life 
Actually bullying in progress, via Wikipedia

I RSS subscribe to Live Science and consider it to be a pretty decent source of information if you factor out global warming/environmental science mumbo jumbo.

Their article “Studies Reveal Why Kids Get Bullied and Rejected”, caught my eye today. Not so much about my kids, but about a few kids I know, and one in particular.

The article summarizes recent research saying that kids bullied and rejected by peers may have trouble in their future. The article also implies that their social skills cause (but don’t warrant) the rejection and bullying.

In the United States, 10 to 13 percent of school-age kids experience some form of rejection by their peers. In addition to causing mental health problems, bullying and social isolation can increase the likelihood a child will get poor grades, drop out of school, or develop substance abuse problems, the researchers say.

I read the above as “consistently experience” – after all everybody has been rejected at some point in their socialization.  If just by a prettier girl, or boy with more options, we each arrive at out own social level through a process of risk.  What is different in kids that experience rejection or bullying is they don’t adjust based on the peer feedback.

The article posits that the lack of adjustment is because they don’t pick up on non-verbal cues.  The article then, correctly, suggests that parents and teachers work proactively with kids to teach how to detect the feedback, and if the rejection has happened how to decode what happened and adjust.

One of the reasons we yanked our son out of public school was that for all the touted “socialization” advantages of school, they were really quite limited. With just 3 minutes between classes, no talking allowed in class prior to the teacher starting, and a compressed 20 minute lunch schedule spent mostly in line for lunch, when exactly was he going to speak to anybody?  

As a home schooler, he still plays with the same neighborhood kids and meets home school groups plus all the other mixed group socialization he gets at the range, stores, and various other outings we engage in (like a tour of the bullet making plant here in town that we did this morning).

As to parents helping with socialization.. that is key. Pay attention. Correct. Parenting is teaching. Show how to do it right, gently correct. I do this ALL the time with my kids.  I let them order at restaurants, and then go over how it went.  I regularly have my son explain stuff to people in my lieu.  We even have a code, where I’ll stop him and say “audience analysis”, and he knows he is not giving the listener what they want.  I send them in to get something at the store. I let them handle stuff now, with my help, so they can safely get better at it.  I’m spending a good deal of effort teaching new methods of communication – like e-mail.

How else will it happen?  By osmosis I guess.  But I see working proactively at this as an advantage I can leave to my kids. Most people think my 12 year old is older – based on size (he’s a gentle giant) and also verbal and written skills. That doesn’t happen by accident.   These are areas I can affect with modest effort, so why not?  It seems obvious.  Yet a lot of parents don’t bother. That mystifies me.  These kinds of things I can give my kids, (tax free!), that will help them forever.

Other thoughts….

Bullying… As the new kid in MANY schools, I had a lot of experience with bullies. As I think back on them, most bullies were very insecure. I’ve made friends with bullies and I’ve beat the snot (or worse) out of bullies. Both were very satisfying, but the first is probably better for the long term.

Rejection… parents and teachers that tell kids to stop rejecting other kids do the OTHER kids a disservice. Better would be to enlist their help in teaching the other kids how to adjust to the rejection feedback. 

Feb 02

Here are 30 examples of nifty infographics. I liked:

image4 Cool infographics

and

image5 Cool infographics

Click the images to see them bigger.

Jan 19

Wow… I wish somebody would do this for Rush…

http://www.mikemake.com/#72772/Charting-the-Beatles

He charted the Beatle’s song keys, writing collaboration, self-referencing of past Beatles songs, and their work schedule.

image thumb70 Analyzing the Beatles image thumb71 Analyzing the Beatles

Jan 19

image thumb69 How thick is the earth’s crust? 
Contour map of earths crust. In kilometers.

Source: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/structure/crust/index.php

Calculated using seismic refraction

Jan 04

 One view of what has changed

Via http://cinema-and-movie.com