Aug 27

As Washington fetes Edward Kennedy it says more about the low state our capitol and its elected inhabitants have sunk to than about him.

My thoughts turn, instead, to someone who won’t have lavish praise this week – someone who had her life cut short many years ago

I place Edward Kennedy with OJ as someone who got away with murder. And I don’t understand people like our Utah Senators and other folks purporting to “represent” us can value his political accomplishments above his criminal and moral failings.That backwards thinking is why they don’t really “represent” us – they are creatures of DC and it is time they are called home.

May 19

image thumb61 Should be terminated

Arrested 101 times

Some states correctly have the death penalty for heinous crimes. But what about one for lifetime achievement?

Apr 03

image thumb22 Moles?

The CIA, State Department and DoJ are sprinkled with Democrats that put their political party ahead of America’s interest.    So, with that in mind, I’ve been Googling trying to find the political affiliations of the prosecutors charged with misconduct in the Ted Stevens corruption trial:

William M. Welch II, Brenda K. Morris, Nicholas A. Marsh, Edward P. Sullivan, Joseph W. Bottini, and James A. Goeke

So far, I’ve found zilch, nada, zip, zero. They’ve covered their tracks well.

I can’t help but think they are Democrats, most career government lawyers are.   Were they prosecuting Stevens to help the Senate become Democratic controlled?  Was this their time to “step up” and take one for the team? 

I can’t find a thing. Maybe somebody else knows.

This is some government we have.  The “Public Integrity” section of the Department of Justice has no integrity and their Senator for life target may not have been guilty of this but he certainly was guilty of being a worthless political hack.

 

Mar 24

280998.001 20.5, in jail 280998.002 20.5, in jail

JAEGER, COURTNEY DIANA
Birth Date: 11/07/89
32A-12-209
ALCOHOL- MINOR CONSUM

Clearly a 21 year old is MUCH more responsible than a 20.5 year old. Everybody knows that.

We need dramatic change in the way we treat our young people. High expectations and fewer rules will help.

We also need to legalize many things now illegal.

Feb 05

 

image thumb28 Armed Robbery – 3 years, 30 days later, murder

Should have been locked up

I caught a show this evening called “The First 48”. It traces a murder investigation for the critical first 48 hours. Tonight the show followed the murder of a young man in Birmingham, Alabama.  He was robbed, shot and murdered in front of a crowd of people in his car.  By all accounts, he was a decent, hard working, young man.

The suspect, who confessed but is still “presumed” innocent, had been out of jail for just 30 days.  He had served 3 years for armed robbery. 

Three years. Armed Robbery. That makes no sense. That is the 2nd crime in this story.  It seems obvious, apparently to everyone but our political elite, that somebody who takes a gun and robs another has decided that society’s norms are just not for them.

I see no reason to not kill them. Or at a minimum to lock them away for a length of time indistinguishable from forever.

You can go on about how prison is expensive blah blah blah.  But I think we should worry about making prison cheap, which seems very doable, rather than figuring out what to do with young men that are incapable of not being dangerous to others.

Kill them. Strand them on a desert island. Lock them up in a large swath of desert. I don’t care. Just keep them away from the rest of us.

Jan 30

image thumb145 The 80 / 20 problem
Ken’s plan for gang members

In project management, especially in software projects, the 80-20 rule states that 80% of the work is in 20% of the project.  Generally, that seems true.

The FBI surprisingly reports that 80% of crime in the US is caused by gangs that have grown to 1 million members:

Criminal gangs in the USA have swelled to an estimated 1 million members responsible for up to 80% of crimes in communities across the nation, according to a gang threat assessment compiled by federal officials.

I suspect, unfortunately, that way less than 80% of our law enforcement resources are devoted to gang problems.

Not that that increasing resources would help much. Gangs, like terrorists, love free countries where they can violate with impunity and hide behind the skirts of our Constitutional protections.

You could say “well, I’ll take that bad with good” but that would be simple minded. Since the massive resources already applied to law enforcement aren’t helping, we clearly need a better method of prevention.

On the Constitution, some rights already are taken once a crime is committed. For instance,  felons and the voting right (you can’t!) .  So it seems reasonable and accepted that rights can be revoked for cause.

Locking them up does good (they don’t’ commit crimes against the public while locked up), but it is expensive and they continue gang activity in prison. So let’s just kill them.

If gangs are causing 80% of our crime then it is imperative that we greatly increase the cost of being in a gang. My preference…. kill them. Anybody convicted of committing any crime while involved in a gang should be automatically sentenced to a near term execution.  I bet you that million member count would drop precipitously .

Harsh?  I don’t think so.  It is likely a gang stole my truck, trailer and 2 ATV’s last year. I’m fine killing those SOB’s.  I’d buy the bullets or do the deed myself if given the chance.

The rules would then be clear. Don’t be part of the .3% causing 80% of our crime. If you are, sayonara.