Apr 20

image thumb49 Bunch of overreaching dummies
Future judge?

This set of questions, asked by our Supreme Court, makes me think most of them are morons.

Justice Stephen G. Breyer said that a certain amount of personal texting was to be expected. “You want to let them have a few,” Breyer said. “You need pizza when you are on duty.”

or this gem:

“He’s talking to the girlfriend,” Justice Kennedy said, and the caller “gets a voice message that says: ‘Your call is very important to us. We will get back to you.’ ”

They went straight into debating internal police department policies that they have no experience, or standing, to get into.

This is simple. Ontario PD provides a phone, or a pager, and says “you have no expectation of privacy with this device”. End of story.  The officer could say “I need privacy, I quit”. Or he could say “okay, I’ll bring my own phone”.  Ontario’s policy isn’t onerous. It doesn’t say no personal communication – just keep it minimal, and we are watching.

I notice no questions from Justice Scalia – he must have been bemusedly quiet as the other morons on the court had their policy discussion.

3 Responses to “Bunch of overreaching dummies”

  1. kevin Says:

    Stupid questions. I doubt they would have gotten in trouble if the texts were just about pizza. My guess is they will o erturn the 9th circuit, as is their custom.

  2. Kevin Says:

    What’s left out is why they are doing all this conversing on city time. We aren’t talking about a couple of texts but numerous texts, many when they should have been working.

  3. Kevin Says:

    By the way, Orielly mentions it in his legal segment tonight